I always think about what category is this person falling into first, because that helps me flex my communication style. It was flooding everywhere, and then my coffee spilled on me…and then I got all wet getting out of my car…” Jennifer: (Laughing) If a Negative Nancy is spirited, she’s like, “Alright guys, it’s another bad day!”Ĭourtney: A spirited Negative Nancy might get to the office, and she’s like “Oh my gosh you guys, I had the worst drive to work today. In which quadrant do I think they land?Īre they more direct, are they more inspirational and spirited, are they more steady and considerate, are they more conscientious and systematic? Even though they might be Negative, Nancy can fall into any one of those four quadrants. She is very open about that and said, “I don’t think I would’ve gotten a single job on the stage if it hadn’t been for my mother’s friends.What we all think when we run into Negative Nancy at work…Ĭourtney: When it comes to Negative Nancy or any personality type we’re about to discuss, I like to first think about the communication style quadrants. She herself would acknowledge that all along the way in her show business career, from start to finish, she benefited from a lot of nepotism. So if you look at how her screen test was engineered remarkably in a way that it seemed almost impossible that she could have failed it, that’s interesting.
Nancy Reagan’s adoptive father and mother had come to Spencer Tracy’s aid a number of times, including when he needed to dry out from his alcoholic binges, finding him the hospital where he could have that privacy. He had been a family friend of Nancy’s mother going back to their early days on the stage not that long after the turn of the century.
#Negative nancy and other names movie#
There’s a lot of evidence that the person who initially helped her most was Spencer Tracy, who at the time was considered one of the most bankable, most beloved movie stars in Hollywood. The actual story is even more interesting. What do you think that discussion was missing? The factoid that was circulating dealt with Nancy Reagan’s reputation in her Hollywood days and how she ended up with a contract at MGM, something you cover quite a bit in your book. This is not a defense in the book review. So the reaction to the book was so outsized that the New York Times thought it was necessary to defend Nancy Reagan, who is not someone they normally would’ve been defending? Our conversation has been edited and condensed.
What really was going on with Nancy in Hollywood? Karen Tumulty, a Washington Post editor who published a new biography of Nancy Reagan (née Davis) earlier this year, kindly agreed to weigh in. (The phrase “blow job queen” was one of the more polite epithets tossed around.) But it wasn’t exactly clear how reliable all of this was the detail came from a much-debated biography from the early ’90s, for one thing. Twitter users took it from there, with maximum vulgar glee. You can read a thorough explanation of what happened here, but the long and short of it is that the former first lady became a trending topic on Twitter after an old anecdote concerning her skill at fellatio during her Hollywood days resurfaced. One of the stranger news stories, if you can call it that, of the last week was the very public dredging up of Nancy Reagan’s sexual history via a winding path that involved both conservative commentator Ben Shapiro’s sister and pop legend Madonna.
0 kommentar(er)
